Meeting Summary
People Against Genocide Everywhere Zoom Meeting Uniting for Peace Resolution
June 24, 2025
There was consensus that UN troops need to be sent into Gaza immediately and to achieve this, the global movement must mobilize around one demand: “UN Protection Forces into Gaza now.” ALL actions must carry this demand. This is a global initiative, working on two fronts, 1) the UN and governmental fronts, and 2) the mass movement front. Please read the strategy information on the following link for more details: UN PROTECTION FORCES INTO GAZA NOW!
There is a strategy and timetable for this to happen ( click here)
There is a symbiotic relationship between the organizational and structural component of the UN and the diplomatic avenues of addressing this Resolution, and the global protest movement to pressure the UN countries to move rapidly to vote on and enforce this Resolution. That a strong and focused global campaign allows those countries who support the Resolution encouragement and cover, while at the same time putting pressure on those countries who may be vacillating or perhaps even opposed to UN intervention. That there is never a monolithic structure in any country, and mass actions would give strength to any minority segment in a country supporting the Resolution.
Over 60 people met to discuss the Uniting for Peace Resolution calling for the UN to immediately send UN troops into Gaza and the other Occupied Territories to stop the genocide and open all humanitarian corridors without interference or participation from Israel or the U.S. The focus of the meeting was to evaluate the viability of the PAGE proposal (click here to view), to discuss what would be the necessary conditions needed to have such a resolution passed, and how the necessary political and social conditions could be evaluated and developed for its success. The meeting was moderated by Eric Rubin and Kate Gordon.
Craig Mokhiber, former director of the UN Human Rights Office in New York, who was a meeting participant, was asked to open the meeting with his insights and thoughts of the above. Here is a summation of his opening remarks:
· Only a 2/3 vote by the General Assembly is needed to pass the resolution, and no Security Council vote is necessary.
· The Uniting for Peace mechanism was used to override a Security Council member veto during the Suez Canal conflict of 1956.
· The Uniting for Peace resolution empowers the General Assembly to take action on matters of international peace and security when the Security Council fails to do so due to lack of unanimity among its permanent members.
· Any country can call for the Emergency Special Session (ESS). But only Palestine could provide the consent necessary to deploy a mission there.
· The Uniting for Peace resolution could authorize the deployment of a UN defensive peacekeeping force to Gaza and eventually to all of the Occupied Territories, since Israel has no sovereignty or authority in Gaza, the West Bank, or East Jerusalem, and their presence there is entirely unlawful.
· The UNGA cannot “enact” sanctions, but it can call on all states to embargo arms, and cease all trade, investment, economic, diplomatic, and cultural relations with the Israeli regime. It can also call for the creation of a tribunal to investigate and bring to trial all those charged with crimes against humanity.
· If the State of Palestine requests the Resolution, troops can legally enter Gaza and the rest of Palestine as well, as the ICJ has found that Israel has no sovereignty or authority in Gaza, the West Bank, or East Jerusalem, and their presence there is entirely unlawful. Thus, the only required consent is the State of Palestine, (although the resolution should also call for full cooperation from Egypt and Jordan to facilitate the staging and entry of the UN force).
· The State of Palestine would be the best, quickest, and most favorable UN member to approve the resolution and submit it to the UN General Assembly, but any country can call for an ESS of the GA to begin the same process. Co-sponsors from a small group of core countries from each region of the world should be sought and lobbied, such as South Africa, Namibia, Spain, Ireland, and Norway. The State of Palestine and the General Assembly would then decide which countries would send troops and armaments into Gaza, and potentially the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
· The entire State of Palestine is also under occupation and faces difficulties; acknowledging this and understanding the political dynamics and contradictions there can help us understand how to best approach and work with them.
· The focus should be putting mass pressure on the UN in New York and UN Missions as the primary focus, and pressure on Israeli embassies and consulates should be secondary and used in locations where the primary focus locations are not accessible.
Eric Rubin then stated that: Despite the mass protests against the genocide for the past 20 months, the genocide has only gotten worse, and that an immediate change of course is needed, and that focus must be to immediately "Send a “UN Protection Force into Gaza Now.” With this new focus all slogans,protests, signs, banners, etc. should reflect this shift. If mass continuous pressure is created utilizing the targeted picket-lines in each country targeting the Ports and UN agency headquarters, and National Seats of Government this changes the role of protests by calling for each government to play an active and deciding role in supporting the specific and concrete action of the Uniting for Peace Resolution and actions contained in it.
· There is a strategy and timetable for this to happen ( click here)
· There is a symbiotic relationship between the organizational and structural component of the UN and the diplomatic avenues of addressing this Resolution, and the global protest movement to pressure the UN countries to move rapidly to vote on and enforce this Resolution. That a strong and focused global campaign allows those countries who support the Resolution encouragement and cover, while at the same time putting pressure on those countries who may be vacillating or perhaps even opposed to UN intervention. That there is never a monolithic structure in any country, and mass actions would give strength to any minority segment in a country supporting the Resolution.
· Picket-lines at shipping Ports Internationally creates a 24/7 awareness, and though the pickets would not try to prevent access to the Ports, it does provide “cover” for any dockers who sympathize, and any slowdowns in international shipping may be seen as incentive for a “facilitated resolution.”
· The global social movement will not be methodical, but likened to the student encampments, first there was one, then a week later there were hundreds. “A single spark, can start a prairie fire.”
Most common questions from attendees:
· How do we do this? What are the action steps we can take right now to move this forward? How do we contact these other countries that are more supportive of Palestine?
· How are we getting this message out to the many organizations internationally so we can all be on the same page?
· Is there an international or should there be individual national petitions demanding UN troops into Gaza?
· Because the US & Israel will intimidate, threaten and punish nations that go against them, and since Israel & the US are determined to ethnically cleanse Gaza, how likely to succeed is Craig's worthy suggestion?
· How should we reach out to the Global March to Gaza participants and bring them on board with this? Initiatives like the fleet of ships that Malaysia is sending to break the blockade should be a focused on as well.
· Even though the US will not participate, how can those in the US most effectively assist so that the US military will not obstruct the effort on land, sea, and air as a UN Emergency Force deploys?
Notable comments and questions:
· One participant active with the UN stated that student encampments and activism have a huge impact on the UN, shaping how UN staff speak and conduct their meetings. They emphasized the role of student encampments in the fall of apartheid in South Africa, noting countries falling like dominoes after enough public and financial pressure was mounted.
· Another participant noted both the urgent and personal nature of this issue stating they don’t trust the Palestinian Authority, and asked if the troops would be in the rest of Palestine as well or just Gaza, or is this subject to the discretion of the countries introducing this resolution. What would the timeline be? Why hasn’t this been done already? “We need the genocide to stop so I will support almost anything to make this happen. But if we get this going and Israel doesn’t let them in, then what? What are the methods of enforcement and/or consequences if they won’t let them in or they target them.” Has anyone reached out to Francesca about this proposal and what are her thoughts?
· Another participant stated that the fast outside of the UN office in New York City is scheduled through the end of June and advised the fast should continue past June as a way to pressure the UN and create publicity. They asked if there are existing groups that could help? E.g., Progressive International and The Hague Group. Or are they passive and do we need to start from scratch?
Other concerns and questions from attendees:
- The Samson option was brought up as a concern and potential obstacle.
- Egypt and Jordan’s complicity, and Egypt specifically being the second largest recipient of US aid was brought up as a concern, as the US would likely threaten to cut off aid if Egypt cooperated.
- How would we lobby friendly states like Ireland, South Africa, etc. to mobilize support in advance of a vote?
- What can we do at a local level? Would it be wise to organize a constant local picket line and what is our timeline on that?
- The Hague Group is meeting in Brazil next month; but perhaps we should suggest to the Hague Group to send its diplomats to hold its meeting inside Gaza (go via Egypt and challenge Egyptians to stop foreign diplomats not activists) and bring media with them. Why bother having it in Brazil?
- How can this be linked to support protests against Maersk being organized by the Palestinian Youth Movement?
Conclusion
There was consensus that a “UN Protection Force” needs to be sent into Gaza immediately and to achieve this, the global movement must mobilize around one demand: “UN Protection Force into Gaza now.” ALL actions must carry this demand. This is a global initiative, working on two fronts, 1) the UN and governmental fronts, and 2) the mass movement front. Please read the strategy information on the following link for more details: UN PROTECTION FORCE INTO GAZA NOW!
If you’d like to be involved in any way, please fill out the action form here, and indicate how you’d like to support and what skills you have that could be of use.
Thank you so much and we look forward to working together.
Sincerely,
Eric Rubin
People Against Genocide Everywhere
https://peopleagainstgenocideeverywhere.org